Improving pitch discrimination

28 02 2012

I’ve been taking part in a clinical study over the last few months on factors affecting audio-perception in patients with cochlear implants.

This study was conducted to determine if cochlear implant sound processors can be adapted to improve speech perception.  My processor program on my older processor (now two years old!) was changed to improve pitch discrimination, based on my discrimination abilities during testing, and evaluated with speech perception tests.

During initial testing, the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) was used. Two lists of ten common, simple sentences (such as “The weather looks good today”) were used in quiet and noise with sentences administered at +10 signal to noise ratio, to give a baseline level of my ability to discriminate.

During the first session I undertook a pitch discrimination task. Two sounds (beeps) were played, and I was asked to say which sound is higher in pitch. Each sound is a separate electrode on my implant being stimulated, and this was continued for all electrodes to work out which ones give the clearest pitch, and if there are electrodes which sound the same.  This went on for 2-3 hours … uggg! I had a new program added to my sound processor to try out, based on the pitch task, and I used this all the time. This meant I had about 6 electrodes switched off and a simpler map.

During session 2, one month later, I underwent the same speech perception tests with the new program and then was given a different program to try based on the results of another pitch discrimination task.

During session 3, one month later, I underwent the same speech perception tests with the latest program and then asked which program I preferred out of the two new programs and the original one that I started with.  I couldn’t tell that there were any major differences between them, they were slightly different in the quality of the sound but I could have lived with any of them. However, the speech discrimination tests told a different story …

HINT testing in quiet :

Bilateral % Left ear only (older CI) %
Nov 2011 57 Dec 2011 48
Dec 2011 84 Feb 2012 70

Out of 26 in this clinical trial group, 4 saw an increase in their speech perception scores. It is likely that a simpler map allowed my brain to ‘sit back’ for a while, take the time to absorb sounds through a simpler map, then start again refreshed. :)

Now, it’s onwards and upwards with more auditory verbal therapy, as I’ve purchased a course of AVT from Pindrop Hearing on Harley Street. This course is ideal for hearing aid users but not quite as effective for cochlear implant users. This new version of LACE training has British accents but the regular testing is done with US accents, as the comparative data is pulled from the US database of other LACE users.

I’m willing to try anything to increase my speech perception scores, so watch this space. I wonder if I will ever be able to hit 100%?

About these ads

Actions

Information

5 responses

7 03 2012
Peter Stelmacovich

Hitting 100% seems like a very lofy goal. There’s nothing wrong with trying to achieve your full potential, but do you think you might drive yourself crazy by shooting for such a high target?

13 03 2012
Tina

I’ve always thought, if I shoot for the stars, I might catch one. Already, I’ve outdone the expectations of my cochlear implant team. I know of other pre-lingually deafened CI recipients who achieve in the region of 90-98% in tests. I’m willing to give it a good try!

Rashed has achieved 80% speech comprehension within a few weeks of activation. It’s possible. Check out his post at Bilaterally Numb.

19 05 2012
Denise Stokes

seems you did catch a star , and its a wonderful journey and nice to see it goes well when you actually Want it too

19 05 2012
Denise Stokes

I had a Cochlear implant over 18 months ago and still rewiring the speech process it takes a lot of feedback and a heap of patience but at first i could not distinguish tone , pitch but in putting in a lot of effort i reagaied 90 % and am still increasing that input, and continue to Participate in using the Speech Processor to it fullest ability.

19 05 2012
Tina

It’s surprising how much work it takes, isn’t it? 90% is amazing! :)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s